Motilal Oswal has reiterated its BUY rating on JSW Steel with a target price of ₹1,350, implying an 18% upside from the current price of ₹1,144.
That's a solid opportunity in India's largest steel producer, now supercharged by a strategic joint venture with Japan's JFE Steel.
Read the full Motilal Oswal research report (PDF)
You can view the live call here:
Visit the MO Alpha Advice stock call page
The investment thesis rests on three pillars: a game-changing JV that slashes debt, margin recovery backed by safeguard duties, and an aggressive capacity expansion roadmap to 50 MTPA.
On December 3rd, JSW Steel announced a strategic restructuring of its Bhushan Power and Steel Limited (BPSL) unit. Here's how the deal works:
The Structure:
What JSW Steel Gets:
The BPSL Backstory: JSW Steel acquired BPSL through the IBC (insolvency) process in 2021 for ₹193.5 billion. At the time, it was a distressed asset with 2.75 MTPA capacity. JSW turned it around, expanded capacity to 4.5 MTPA, and in FY25 BPSL generated:
At ₹530 billion EV against FY28E EBITDA of ₹45 billion for BPSL, the transaction values the unit at approximately 11.8x forward EBITDA. That's a solid exit valuation for JSW Steel.
Read more: How to Calculate the Valuation of a Company
One Catch: The restructuring involves issuing shares to JSW Shipping (a promoter entity) to buy out its 17.35% stake in Piombino Steel Ltd (which holds BPSL). This will cause ~2% equity dilution in JSW Steel. However, promoter holding will actually increase from 45.3% to 46.74% post-transaction.
JSW Steel isn't just deleveraging, it's aggressively expanding. Here's the trajectory:
Note: The company also has 1.5 MTPA capacity in the US, bringing total capacity to 51.5 MTPA by FY31.
Read more: When Should You Exit a Stock
Capex Plan:
About 96% of capex through FY28 is earmarked for India operations, split across:
Sales volumes have grown consistently and are expected to accelerate:
Capacity utilization has ranged between 78-91% over the years. With new capacity coming online and domestic demand improving (thanks to infrastructure push and safeguard duties on imports), the company has headroom to push volumes higher.
This is where things get interesting. JSW Steel's EBITDA per tonne collapsed in FY23 and FY25 due to weak steel prices and high input costs. The analysts expect a sharp recovery:
What's driving the recovery?
Here's the consolidated financial trajectory:
The PAT growth of 184% in FY26E looks dramatic, but context matters: FY25 was a terrible year with profit down 58% due to weak steel prices. The FY26E figure represents a recovery to more normalized levels, not an extraordinary surge.
The JFE deal is primarily about fixing the balance sheet. Here's the trajectory:
The net debt-to-EBITDA ratio stood at 2.97x as of Q2FY26. Post the JFE transaction and with improving EBITDA, this is expected to decline to 1.7x by FY27E. The long-term average for JSW Steel is 2.4x, so the company is moving toward a more comfortable leverage position.
Read more: How to Analyse Quarterly Results Using 8 Financial Ratio
The analysts use an EV/EBITDA methodology:
How does the valuation compare to history?
The stock is trading above its long-term average but below the +1 standard deviation level. Given the improving fundamentals and deleveraging story, a slight premium to historical average seems justified.
Similarly on P/B:
1. Strategic Value Unlocking: The JFE partnership monetizes the BPSL turnaround at an attractive valuation while retaining 50% ownership and gaining access to Japanese technology.
2. Massive Debt Reduction: ₹350 billion debt reduction in one transaction fundamentally changes the risk profile of the stock.
3. Capacity Growth Visibility: Clear roadmap to 50 MTPA by FY31, with approved capex already covering expansion to 43.4 MTPA.
4. Margin Tailwinds: Safeguard duties + softer input costs + higher volumes = EBITDA margin expanding from 13.6% to 20.6% over three years.
5. Return Ratios Improving: RoE climbing from 4.8% (FY25) to 18.8% (FY28E), and RoCE from 5.4% to 13.1%.
1. Steel Price Volatility: The thesis depends on domestic steel prices holding up. Any rollback of safeguard duties or surge in cheaper imports could pressure realizations.
2. Execution Risk on Expansion: Adding 16 MTPA capacity over six years is ambitious. Delays or cost overruns could impact returns.
3. Coking Coal Price Spikes: While input costs are expected to remain soft, coking coal is imported and subject to global supply disruptions.
4. Demand Slowdown: Steel demand is tied to infrastructure spending and construction activity. Any slowdown in government capex or real estate could hurt volumes.
5. JV Transaction Risks: The JFE deal is subject to regulatory approvals and could face delays. The second tranche of ₹76 billion is expected only by September 2026.
6. Equity Dilution: The ~2% dilution from buying out JSW Shipping's stake, while minor, does impact per-share metrics.
Consider JSW Steel if you:
Avoid JSW Steel if you:
Motilal Oswal has a target price of ₹1,350 for JSW Steel, representing an 18% upside from the current price of ₹1,144. This is based on 9x EV/EBITDA multiple applied to September 2027 estimates.
The analysts maintain a BUY rating. The JFE Steel joint venture is a positive catalyst that reduces debt by ₹350 billion while unlocking value from BPSL. Margin recovery is expected from FY26 onwards. However, steel stocks are cyclical and subject to commodity price volatility.
JSW Steel is restructuring its Bhushan Power and Steel (BPSL) unit into a 50:50 joint venture with Japan's JFE Steel. JFE will invest ₹157.5 billion for its 50% stake, and the JV will raise ₹210 billion in debt. JSW Steel receives ₹320 billion in cash and removes ₹350 billion from its consolidated debt.
JSW Steel aims to expand capacity from 34.2 MTPA currently to 50 MTPA by FY31. Near-term additions include 2 MTPA at Vijayanagar, 5 MTPA at Dolvi, and 0.5 MTPA at BPSL. A Phase-II expansion of 8.1 MTPA is planned for later.
Consolidated debt will reduce by approximately ₹350 billion, including ₹50 billion of BPSL debt being removed from JSW Steel's books. The net debt-to-EBITDA ratio is expected to decline from 3.6x (FY25) to 1.8x (FY27E).
EBITDA per tonne was ₹8,659 in FY25, which was a weak year. This is expected to recover to ₹11,355 in FY26E, ₹13,048 in FY27E, and ₹13,780 in FY28E, driven by higher steel prices (post safeguard duty) and softer input costs.
Both are large integrated steel producers. JSW Steel is the largest private producer in India with a clearer domestic focus. Tata Steel has significant European operations that have been a drag on profitability. JSW Steel's JFE partnership gives it access to Japanese technology for high-value steel production.
Key risks include steel price volatility, execution delays in capacity expansion, coking coal price spikes, demand slowdown from infrastructure or real estate sectors, and regulatory delays in the JFE transaction.
JSW Steel is in the middle of a strategic transformation. The JFE partnership is a smart move, it monetizes the successful BPSL turnaround, slashes debt, and brings in a technology partner without losing control of the asset.
The stock trades at 8.4x FY27E EV/EBITDA, slightly above historical averages but justified by the improving fundamentals. With EBITDA margins expected to expand from 13.6% to 20.6% over three years and PAT growing at a 63-64% CAGR from the FY25 trough, the 18% upside to target looks achievable.
The key variable is steel prices. If safeguard duties hold and global steel supply remains disciplined, JSW Steel should deliver on these estimates. If steel prices crack, all bets are off, but that's the nature of investing in cyclical commodities.
Disclaimer: The companies mentioned in the article are for information purposes only. This is not investment advice.
Trading Mindset
02 Jan, 2026
Trading Mindset
31 Dec, 2025
Trading Mindset
28 Dec, 2025
Trading Mindset
26 Dec, 2025
Trading Mindset
25 Dec, 2025